Senior U.S. military leadership were warned before the Iran war that an Army logistics hub in Kuwait was uniquely vulnerable to a drone strike. Those warnings went unheeded..

Help us help you. We want to better understand how you engage with The Associated Press and our products and programs. Please take this short survey to help improve the experience for our readers.

Exclusive reporting from AP has revealed that senior U.S. military leadership were warned before the Iran war that an Army logistics hub at Port Shuaiba in Kuwait was uniquely vulnerable to a drone strike. Those warnings went unheeded — and the repercussions were deadly.

In the earliest days of the United States’ war against Iran, an Iranian drone strike on Port Shuaiba killed six American soldiers and wounded dozens more. Nearly eight months later, with no end to the conflict in sight, the attack has been forgotten by many — but not by the loved ones of those impacted, and not by The Associated Press.

AP journalists were able to talk to 13 active-duty service members on the record, including officers who were familiar with high-level briefings prior to the strike. This is exceptional: active-duty military personnel rarely speak openly to press. Because of AP’s dogged, nonpartisan reporting, sources trusted us to bring their concerns to light and to demand answers from military leadership.

 

As the war in Iran continues, reporting like this is critical. Our investigation raises questions about the Army’s preparedness amid an ongoing conflict. Can you help us continue asking hard questions and holding truth to power with a donation?

DONATE

Door attendants secure the doors of the transfer vans containing the remains of U.S. Army Reserve soldiers who were killed in a drone strike at a command center in Kuwait after the U.S. and Israel launched its military campaign against Iran. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

AP reporters Jack Brook and Julie Watson were key in bringing the bigger story behind the attack to life. They share:

Several of the first soldiers we spoke with said early on that there remained a lot to the story that had not been publicly reported. From hearing accounts of soldiers who were part of intelligence briefings, we learned that red flags were being raised consistently up the chain of command for weeks prior to the relocation to the port and right up to the morning of the attack. 

For several of the soldiers, Jack cold-called them and we just started talking. Sometimes, just getting someone on the line and showing that you know details about their story leaves people open to keep talking. When we approached soldiers, we let them know that we wanted to hear about their experience in an open-ended manner. We also asked them what they felt the public needed to know. That gave them control to speak about what mattered to them.

These are individuals who have gone through an incredibly traumatic experience and in most cases were still recovering from the physical and emotional toll of the attack. We had to build trust with soldiers who were wary of speaking publicly. This often involved an initial off the record or “background” conversation to build trust and understanding before they were willing to use their name and go “on the record.” Most of the families did not respond to our initial outreach or declined to talk with us at first.

As we got closer to publishing our reporting, some of the families decided they wanted to be part of the story and have their voice heard...One widow, Tina Marzan, told us that she was nervous to do an interview but that the AP had “a good reputation” and so was willing to trust us. One thing we made clear to sources like Mrs. Marzan is that we were focused on conveying their experiences and feelings as part of a fact-driven article not in service of any political agenda.

The story of Port Shuaiba didn’t end with the strike. Some of the soldiers wounded in the attack experienced delays in much-needed care in the days and weeks afterwards. Survivors with serious head injuries and shrapnel wounds found themselves sent back to Army barracks rather than admitted for inpatient care.

With this story still unfolding and the war continuing with no exit ramp in sight, rigorous reporting like this is essential. Your support is part of what makes it possible.

It takes AP’s relentless independent journalism to ask difficult questions of those in power and uncover the facts on behalf of the public — and it takes donors like you to help Jack, Julie and their colleagues continue their work.

Can you donate to The Associated Press today?

DONATE

P.S. Read more of AP's exclusive reporting on the aftermath of the strike on Port Shuaiba here.

SUPPORT THE AP. DONATE.
FacebookTwitterInstagramTikTokLinkedInYouTube
Get in on Google PlayDownload on the App Store

Privacy policy | Unsubscribe or Manage Preferences