In the span of three days this month, a defense lawyer was rebuked for filing fabricated police witness testimony in a New Mexico murder case, prosecutors in Oklahoma disclosed that a judge's order there had cited fake cases, and a lawyer representing State Farm in Los Angeles was fined for erroneous citations across seven court filings.
The materials in each case were produced using generative AI, adding to a mountain of made-up, misquoted, misleading or incorrectly cited legal filings since the technology debuted on a mass scale in 2022.
What’s happening:
Three years after the first U.S. court sanction over AI-generated errors, the number of attorneys admitting they used AI carelessly keeps growing, with AI errors now reaching into court opinions, expert testimony and prosecutors' briefs. AI "hallucinations" have now surfaced in at least 1,395 cases in U.S. state and federal courts, according to a researcher tracking the cases on his website.
Mike Scarcella has the story here.