Daily Skimm
But first: GLP-1s without the 1000% markup — Check out what we Skimm’d for you today
daily_skimm
TOGETHER WITH
Collective Peptides

But first: GLP-1s without the 1000% markup


Update location or View forecast

Quote of the Day

"The fact that a couple in their mid-30s is considered youth is kinda cool af"

— One commenter on the first cover stars for the new W Youth magazine. Technically, Hailey is 29 and Justin is 32, but who’s counting?

Mom doing laundry with two young children
Politics of Parenting

Get By With a Little Help From… the White House?

What’s going on: Childcare is so expensive that many parents are asking if working is worth it when their entire paycheck is eaten up by daycare. The Trump administration is proposing a solution… but only married couples need apply. Per The New York Times, four-time dad Vice President JD Vance is pushing a federal subsidy for families with one stay-at-home parent that would likely amount to $9,000 annually per child. According to The NYT, the money will be reallocated from a fund that mainly helps single working parents (disproportionately mothers) afford childcare. The proposed rule, which needs to go through a public comment period, could go into effect by next year if finalized.

What it means: Every parent could use a little childcare help, but the administration’s approach of moving money that’s earmarked for struggling working parents is raising red flags. As one conservative think tank fellow told The NYT, the proposal means “more parents competing for the same dollars, and leaving more parents — particularly single working parents — worse off.” Others say this is all part of the Trump administration’s efforts to “push women into motherhood” by rewarding families with married mothers who stay home and have as many children as possible. Women are already being pushed out of the workforce thanks to the childcare crisis. This proposal won’t help.

Related: Can New Mexico Deliver on Universal Childcare? (The Washington Post gift link)

The News in 5