|
 |
The Coaching Expertise You Already Have Is More Podcastable Than You Think
How to position what you know for podcast audiences and hosts so that the right listeners find you, recognize themselves in what you say, and want to know more
|
| |||||||||||||||
Most coaches who want to start appearing on podcasts make the same mistake before they send a single pitch.
They try to make their expertise sound impressive rather than useful.
The bio they write describes credentials. The topics they list cover broad categories. The angle they pitch is the one that sounds most professional rather than the one that would make a specific listener stop mid-commute and think “That’s exactly what I’m dealing with right now.
Impressive and useful aren’t the same thing on a podcast.
Impressive = polite nods.
Useful = discovery calls.
It’s not always the most credentialed or the most experienced coaches who build real client pipelines through podcast guesting, actually. Usually, they’re the ones who learned how to translate what they know into language that makes the right listener feel immediately understood.
That translation is what this post is about.
Why Coaching Expertise Needs a Different Kind of Positioning
Coaching expertise is different from most other expert categories in one important way.
The value of coaching is the transformation, less about information. And thing is, transformations are harder to pitch than information because they require the listener to see themselves in the outcome before they’ve experienced the process.
A business strategist can say “I’ll show you how to increase revenue by 30% using this specific system” and the listener can evaluate that claim immediately.
A coach who says “I’ll help you become the leader you’re capable of being” is making a claim that depends entirely on the listener’s willingness to believe they’re not that leader yet.
That’s a harder sell in a 45-minute interview. And it’s why most coaches who appear on podcasts walk away with listens rather than leads.
The solution isn’t to pretend coaching is something it isn’t. It’s to position the transformation in language specific enough that the right listener recognizes their own situation before the coach has said anything about what they do.
4 Positioning Shifts That Make Your Coaching Expertise Podcastable
Each shift moves from the language coaches use when describing their work to the language that makes listeners lean in.
1. 🎯 From category to specific problem
 |
The category version names what kind of coaching you do. The specific problem version names the exact situation a client is in when they need you.
Category version: “I’m a leadership coach who helps executives lead more effectively.”
Specific problem version: “I work with first-time executives who are managing people they used to be peers with and finding that everything they knew about doing good work doesn’t transfer to getting good work from others.”
Why the shift matters for podcast positioning: A host can build an episode around a specific problem because they can picture exactly which of their listeners will stop what they’re doing to pay attention. A category gives a host nothing to build an episode around because it could describe any leadership coach anywhere.
How to find your specific problem: Think about the moment a client typically reaches out to you. What was happening in their life or business the week before they sent that first email? That moment is your specific problem.
2. 📖 From process to story
 |
The process version explains how coaching works. The story version shows what changes when it works.
Process version: “My coaching methodology involves a 12-week program combining weekly sessions with accountability structures and mindset work.”
Story version: “One of my clients came to me after being passed over for a promotion she’d been working toward for 3 years. 6 months later she was running the department that had rejected her.”
Why stories convert where processes don’t: A listener who hears your process is evaluating whether to buy it; a listener who hears your story is deciding whether they see themselves in it. The second decision is faster, more emotional, and more likely to produce action.
What to do if you can’t share client stories publicly: Anonymize them completely and name the situation rather than the person. “A client in financial services who had built a team of 20 but couldn’t get them to move without being pushed” is specific enough to land without being identifiable.