The rich and powerful want to live forever
What if they could?
The New York Times Magazine
April 26, 2026

By Mark O’Connell

The quest for immortality is a perennial fascination for me.

The initial impetus for my essay this week was a clip that went viral last year of Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping being recorded on a hot mic discussing the scientific prospect of immortality. I took that moment as a starting point for thinking about the prospect of an immortal or radically life-extended elite, and what that prospect suggests about our current civilizational impasse. I hope I’ll be forgiven for saying that it’s a subject that just refuses to lay down and die.

Back in 2017, I published a piece in the magazine about Zoltan Istvan, an affable Bay Area former real estate investor who was at the time running as an independent candidate in the following year’s presidential election. Zoltan’s platform was a transhumanist one: He was running, essentially, as the immortality candidate, raising awareness about the need to invest in radical life-extension therapies, driving across the United States in a school bus tricked out to look like a gigantic coffin. (At the time, his candidacy seemed like only slightly more of an absurd long shot than the other former real estate guy turned presidential candidate who wound up winning the thing.)

The story about Zoltan and the coffin bus and the whole scientific immortality business was an excerpt from my book that came out the same year, “To Be a Machine,” in which I explored transhumanism as a whole, a movement devoted to using technology to push out the boundaries of the human condition, including eradicating death. Quite a lot has happened since then — including the mainstreaming of the whole radical life extension racket.

FEATURES

How Well Will You Age? Take Our Quiz.

The little daily decisions we make add up — and ultimately shape our longevity.

By Dana G. Smith

The Interview

Bob Odenkirk Would Like to Remind You That Life Is a Meaningless Farce

The actor and comedian is keenly aware of humanity’s limitations, but he’s not giving up.

play button

51 MIN LISTEN

THIS WEEK’S COVER

Source photograph by Adam Gray/Associated Press

COLUMNS

Screenland

The Generations Fantasizing About Boring Office Jobs

“Day in my life” videos filmed at corporate offices fetishize white-collar minutiae. But they reveal something deeper.

By Casey Michael Henry

the ethicist

I Had an Affair With My Friend’s Wife. Should I Tell Him?

I didn’t even know he was married, let alone to her.

By Kwame Anthony Appiah

Judge John Hodgman

Do You Have to Make Pour-Over Coffee for Your Spouse?

A ruling on a dispute over a tedious cup of coffee.

By John Hodgman

FROM THE ARCHIVES

Living Forever, on Ice

Back in 2010, Kerry Howley wrote a story for the magazine about cryonics and the complications in a marriage when one partner is planning on having their brain preserved in liquid nitrogen.

The United States is not necessarily an easy place to take up the banner of letting go; we’re likely to call it “giving up,” and there is of course no purer expression of this attitude than the pursuit of cryonics. Heads and bodies stored in steel tanks, awaiting the moment when medicine advances­ to the point where tissue can be repaired and bodies revived, are pointedly referred to not as remains or cadavers but as “patients.” A stopped heart is seen as no good reason to stop fighting for your life.

And so Peggy expends a certain amount of psychic energy trying to ignore Robin’s cryonics arrangements. Separate bank accounts prevent her from having to see the money spent on annual dues, and the two manage to avoid bringing up the subject at home. When he dies (“which he will,” Peggy adds), it will fall to someone else to call Alcor and explain Robin’s wishes to the hospital staff. “My husband has said, on numerous occasions, ‘Choose life at any cost,’ ” Peggy says. “But I’ve seen people in pain. It’s not worth it.”

COMMENT OF THE WEEK

When Desk Jobs Were the Kiss of Death

From Alex E. on Casey Michael Henry’s essay on how people are fantasizing about boring, 9-to-5 office jobs:

These jobs represent STABILITY. I grew up in the ’90s when a desk job was the kiss of death, an idea explored in countless media of the time. With the economy being so awful, I see many of my 20-something friends aspire to corporate life or cling to it — not because it’s cool, but because they know they’d be eking out an existence without it.

I’m a 40-something artist who recently stepped away from the struggle, relented and took a hybrid-remote computer job. The peace I’ve felt is almost embarrassing. I mourn the loss of my dynamic former life, but it’s pretty cool to have savings.

That’s all for this week. Email us at magazine@nytimes.com with your thoughts, questions and feedback.

Stay in touch:

Like this email? Forward it to a friend and help us grow.

Loved a story? Hated it? Write us a letter at magazine@nytimes.com.

Did a friend forward this to you? Sign up here to get the magazine newsletter.

If you received this newsletter from someone else, subscribe here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for The New York Times Magazine from The New York Times.

To stop receiving The New York Times Magazine, unsubscribe. To opt out of other promotional emails from The Times, including those regarding The Athletic, manage your email settings.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

xinstagramwhatsapp

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

Zeta LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018