Good morning. In focus today, we’re looking at the economics and politics at play in the federal government’s gas-tax break, a blunt political solution to a problem that runs beyond the pump.

Pipelines: Ottawa is leaning toward a new oil pipeline route from Alberta to southern B.C., sources say.

Pensions: OMERS aims to add $10-billion in new investment in Canada as CEO sees opportunities improving.

Farming: Saskatchewan grain farmers are demanding Ottawa force exporters to publish sales data to fill a costly gap in information.

In my heart, I certainly don’t hate the idea of saving a few dollars at the pump. In a world where gas stations every few blocks advertise fresh new horrors, lower prices – for any reason – carry a kind of psychological relief. I might even drive a little further, perhaps to a store that sells camping gear I will never use.

Deep in my incurably cynical soul, I know that’s the power of removing gas taxes, a policy that went into effect yesterday. It is among the most visible tools available to governments to respond to energy market conditions beyond their control. Every digital sign becomes a reminder that Ottawa is acting on a cost drivers see tick up before their very eyes. And it can be implemented almost immediately – in this case, less than a week after its announcement.

But lifting taxes on gas and diesel enjoys little support among economists, who argue the policy is blunt and delivers limited relief to lower-income households. It also follows a November budget framed, in no small part, around sacrifice. Nearly two months into a war that has pushed prices higher, have we reached a point where Ottawa needed to shield households from that pressure?

The former central banker

As a former governor of the Bank of Canada, Mark Carney would have given most of his attention to the underlying trends in yesterday’s March inflation report – measures like CPI-median and CPI-trim that filter out energy and food costs, stripping away volatile swings. Excluding gas, the consumer price index rose by an annual 2.2 per cent in March, compared with 2.4 per cent in February.

Douglas Porter, chief economist at the Bank of Montreal, said all five of the biggest drivers of headline inflation in March were tied to the oil shock: gasoline, travel tours, air fares, fuel oil and fuel for RVs.

Although grocery prices remained elevated and rent ticked up, Canadians saw declines in telephone services, auto insurance, furniture, candy and mortgage interest costs – a mix that suggests inflation outside of energy is easing.

“It could have been worse,” Porter said in a note to clients. “The picture for underlying inflation was a bit better than expected, and continues the recent pattern of steadily moderating core inflation trends.”

The politician

But Carney the Prime Minister has more levers at his disposal than he did as a monetary policy-maker, and is facing a wider set of pressures – including the risk that he is seen as not using those levers to address affordability. Dropping the tax now shows he is acting where he can before negotiations with the United States over free trade make clear where he cannot, and robs his critics of otherwise potent ammunition.

With the White House suggesting it may choose to revisit the deal every year for the next decade, uncertainty will hang over consumers and businesses – but Carney will be able to say his government has already acted on the costs critics would point to first. Already, he has limited Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre to arguing the tax break isn’t long enough.

The crisis manager

Perhaps that helps explain why, rather than using his newly consolidated strength in Parliament to press immediately for deficit reduction or sharper fiscal consolidation – as Jean Chrétien, Paul Martin and Stephen Harper once did at comparable moments – Carney chose instead to offer a modest measure of relief. It is the kind of move the economist in him might well have questioned, but it makes more sense when viewed against the likelihood of a prolonged period of external tension, one that will steadily test how much Canadians are truly prepared to sacrifice.

The day after milestone by-election victories last week, Carney announced a spring economic update will take place later this month. He said it would showcase how his government intends to move forward with its plan to make the Canadian economy stronger and more independent.

“You’ll see more emphasis on taking where we’re going with the economy and making sure that it benefits all Canadians,” he said.

He might struggle to keep voters’ focus on that vision, however, if the price of gas runs higher and higher.

In cutting taxes – rather than letting global markets work through the war on their own, or opting for the more targeted income‑tested transfers economists tend to favour – Carney the crisis manager is prioritizing visibility over precision.

He is effectively turning gas-station price signs into as many billboards: daily, unavoidable reminders that his government is acting on affordability, even as he keeps his focus trained further down the road, and on how much less forgiving the path ahead may be for him.