Plus: Countering drones; growing risks of colorectal cancer ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
The Conversation

Top headlines

Lead story

It’s hard to ignore climate change when you’re living with the consequences: rising temperatures that put lives at risk, intensifying storms that damage property, droughts that dry up farm fields and rangeland. As greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise, studies show those harms are expected to worsen, leaving future generations facing even greater health risks.

The Trump administration sees things differently. On Thursday it moved to rescind the endangerment finding – a 2009 federal determination that greenhouse gas emissions endanger public health and welfare. The finding underpins most U.S. climate policies. In announcing the move, President Donald Trump talked about the benefits of fossil fuels and claimed the endangerment finding had “no basis in fact. None whatsoever.”

We asked a team of physicians and environmental health scientists to take a closer look at the health risks linked to greenhouse gas emissions for our lead story today.

“Anybody who has fallen ill during a heat wave, struggled while breathing wildfire smoke or been injured cleaning up from a hurricane knows that climate change can threaten human health,” write Jonathan Levy of Boston University, Howard Frumkin of the University of Washington, and Jonathan Patz and Vijay Limaye of the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The group writes about those and several other climate-related risks.

The administration’s move will be challenged in court. But as Wesleyan University economist Gary Yohe explains in a second story, rescinding the endangerment finding – no matter what the courts eventually rule – lets the administration start rolling back more U.S. climate policies now, stop collecting important emissions data and likely take more actions to defund science

[How faith and religion drive the world. Sign up for our weekly newsletter, This Week in Religion.]

Stacy Morford

Senior Environment, Climate and Energy Editor

Rising global temperatures are increasing the risk of heat stroke on hot days, among many other human harms. Ronda Churchill/AFP via Getty Images

Trump’s EPA decides climate change doesn’t endanger public health – the evidence says otherwise

Jonathan Levy, Boston University; Howard Frumkin, University of Washington; Jonathan Patz, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Vijay Limaye, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Climate change is making people sicker and more vulnerable to disease, doctors and scientists explain. Erasing the federal endangerment finding increases the risk.

Economy + Business

Health + Medicine

Science + Technology

Politics + Society

Environment + Energy

Podcast