Daily Skimm
But first: A quick word on risk. — Check out what we Skimm’d for you today
daily_skimm
Header Image

But first: A quick word on risk.

Good morning.

Awards season is officially underway — and if you tuned in last night, the Golden Globes didn’t disappoint. Host Nikki Glaser didn’t shy away from calling out the network airing the show, nor from roasting Leonardo DiCaprio. Meanwhile, I’m feeling Supreme because Timmy snagged his first golden statue (and had this sweet moment with Kylie Jenner). Plus, my favorite podcast proved it’s not only a Good Hang, but can win big, too. And my top movie of 2025 also scored some hardware. No, I’m not talking about KPop Demon Hunters, though congratulations are also in order for the creators. Curious about the rest of the winners? Here’s a full list. If you’re like me, it’s just a reminder of how much you need to add to your watchlist. Now, let’s get to the news…

— Maria Corpus / Editor / Madison, WI

In the cell laboratory at the Fertility Center Berlin
Health

Scientists Might've Just Cracked a New Clue About Infertility

What's going on: The world loves to remind women that their biological clock is ticking. We’re born with a finite number of eggs, and over time, their quality can decline — increasing the risk of infertility or miscarriage for some people. But groundbreaking research shared last week is shedding new light on how to potentially improve egg quality. Scientists found that injecting a protein called Shugoshin into eggs could prevent chromosomes from separating too early, helping them stay connected and reducing age-related defects. The study has yet to be peer-reviewed, but researchers hope to launch a clinical trial as their next step.

What it means: If the scientists’ hunch is right, this could reshape in vitro fertilization (IVF) by targeting egg quality directly. The big question now: Will restoring protein levels improve egg health or just prevent it from further deteriorating? Researchers still face a long road ahead, but many are cautiously optimistic and say the findings reflect real progress. As the director of the Cornell Reproductive Sciences Center put it: “[This] won’t solve everybody’s problem … but we’re so much further than even 10 years ago.”

Related: Google’s AI Health Summaries Labeled “Dangerous” and “Alarming” (The Guardian)

The News in 5