Points of Return
To get John Authers’ newsletter delivered directly to your inbox, sign up here. Trump bludgeoned his way to another trade deal, with the EU.
View in browser
Bloomberg

To get John Authers’ newsletter delivered directly to your inbox, sign up here.

Today’s Points:

Hulkamania, Global Trade, and Markets

In the week around the sad passing of the pro-wrestling legend Hulk Hogan, one of his most devoted fans, President Donald Trump, has been honoring his legacy. Wrestling is a staged performance, where the “winners” often portray themselves as bullies. Trump is getting results from Hulkamania in the much tougher world of international trade.

Sunday brought news of a trade “deal” with the European Union, sealed at the president’s golf course in Scotland, which he described, in Hoganesque language, as “the greatest deal of all time.” In it, the EU accepts tariffs of “only” 15% on its exports to the US, and levies zero tariffs in return. This had been largely expected, as Japan’s similar deal several days earlier left the Europeans little choice. The EU also agreed to buy $750 billion in energy from the US, to invest $600 billion in unspecified ways that it wouldn’t previously have done, and to buy American arms. The deal isn’t a trade treaty — such things cannot be thrashed out in a 45-minute meeting at the golf course. It’s barely even about trade. And the EU gets nothing from it. To use a phrase from Tigress Financial Partners’ Jean Ergas, it’s more the extraction of reparations from Europe for perceived past wrongs. 

And yet, it’s market-friendly, because the US had threatened to levy a tariff of 30% on EU imports from Friday. In possibly the biggest victory for Trump, stock markets have brushed off the excitement to set all-time highs.

The deals with Japan and the EU (and others in recent days) follow massive concessions to the administration by the media group Paramount and Columbia University. The classic Hulk tactics have worked, and opponents have been picked off one by one. Despite game theory to the contrary (which Points of Return covered back in April), bullying has paid off. Game theorists show that bullies can be beaten if the victims stand together, and take some pain — the bully will hurt more than they do. The rest of the world seemed ready for this a few months ago. US trading partners from China to Canada and through to the EU immediately threatened retaliation. But now they’re caving one after another.

How has this happened? Facts have helped. To date, tariffs have produced a lot of revenue for Washington without clear negative effects on inflation or US profits. The dollar, contrary to expectation, has weakened, making US goods more competitive and failing to counteract tariffs. That strengthened Trump’s hand and made him more credible. Beyond that, the bully has convinced people he means business with renewed and escalating threats, and his targets haven’t coordinated their defense.

To grasp what might happen next, look at the deal with Japan, another open market that depends on exports more than the US does. Local stocks, also held back by uncertainty around its inconclusive election a week ago, suddenly leapt:

The biggest gainers were Japan’s automakers — a strange outcome as the 15% tariffs are meant to defend the US car industry from the likes of Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co. Japan can now send cars to the US bearing only 15% tariffs, while Ford Motor Co. or General Motors Co. must pay tariffs on all imported components, including 50% on steel; so it’s not clear this dents Japanese cars’ competitiveness. In the chart that follows, note that Tesla Inc. dominates the S&P auto sector and drives its volatility:

It also had an effect on the Japanese bond market. With local investors feeling less need to hold bonds for security, and with uncertainty over domestic politics and trade policy now largely removed as impediments to a rate hike by the Bank of Japan, the 10-year JGB yield, recently held at levels of 0.25% and then 1%, touched 1.6%:

With a big source of uncertainty lifted, European investors will also likely move from bonds to stocks. 

Where does this leave American exceptionalism, or sustained outperformance over the rest of the world? The dollar is plainly weaker after the six months of tariff ructions:

But US stocks have their mojo back. Their steep underperformance as tariffs took shape is over, and they’ve regained what they ceded to the rest of the world since Liberation Day on April 2. The US is now back above shorter-term moving averages:

How can this be, after the all-out choke that followed the announcement of tariffs on Liberation Day? Despite appearances, investors haven’t changed their mind on tariffs. The old saw that markets hate nothing more than uncertainty also comes into play. Eric Robertsen of Standard Chartered said:

Increasingly, equity and bond markets are sending the message that the resolution of tariff uncertainty might matter more than the actual level of tariffs. For now, the risk seems to be that markets are under-positioned for a sustained rally in risky assets.

These are not detailed and carefully negotiated treaties, and may not survive for long. But some clarity on what the tariffs will be for at least a few months, and the knowledge that countries are chickening out of a damaging fight with the bully, are good for now and allow a focus on positive things like artificial intelligence. 

Whether this is a secular bull market will depend on how the economy and markets digest the mixture of fiscal juice, much higher tariffs and mostly lower interest rates that they have been prescribed. Trump has won his bout via two submissions. It will be months before we know whether the economy delivers a fall or a knockout. 

A Capped Performance

For a brief period in mid-2024, small caps’ sudden outperformance stoked the belief that mega caps’ dominance was over. The spark ignited comparisons to the momentum that followed the implosions of the dot-coms in 2000. After that, the Russell 2000 outperformed the Russell Top 50 mega-cap index by a cumulative 200% or more over the next 12 years. Last year, by contrast, anyone who rotated into the 2000 at the beginning of July needed to rotate back into the Top 50 at the end of the month:

The catalysts for that aborted takeoff included the extreme valuations of large caps, big discounts for small caps, loose interest rate expectations and the hope that  Candidate Trump’s tariffs would stave off competition for small caps. All these factors are in place now. And yet, a year on, upstaging mega caps’ AI-driven dominance remains a distant dream. Concentration is extreme, as Apollo’s Torsten Slok shows:

Slok says that $1 million in the S&P 500 on Jan. 1, 2021, would have returned $660,000, of which more than half would have come from the 10 biggest companies:

The bottom line is that returns in the S&P 500 are not diversified but remain extremely concentrated in a small group of tech stocks. AI will continue to have a dramatic impact on all our lives, but the question remains whether the Magnificent Seven are correctly priced, and if they will even be the best AI investments over the next five to 10 years.

For now, these large corporations continue to deliver margins that justify their lofty valuations — a feat notably absent during the dot-com bubble. Nevertheless, such dominance highlights a concentration risk, whereas small caps trading at a discount present an opportunity for investors keen on diversification:

LPL Financial’s Jeff Buchbinder argues that small caps’ cheapness signals undiscovered value or underappreciated growth potential. But could this turn the tide? There is a spirited frenzy in retail investors’ meme stocks, but it will take more than that to stall the mega-cap momentum. Glenmede’s Jordan Irving observes that if “companies are truly judged just quarter to quarter, and quarterly beats get rewarded and misses get punished to the degree that they are,” then small caps won’t be rewarded until they can show consistent earnings improvement. 

Buchbinder maintains that some potential catalysts remain. He cites tax provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that allow businesses to deduct domestic R&D expenses fully, helpful for smaller companies. While the expense deduction is less impactful for larger multinationals, it should reduce tax bills and bolster profits. High-spending companies can retain more cash. 

It is tempting to dismiss these incentives as insufficient to boost the smaller-cap sector. But there are nuances. Societe Generale’s Andrew Lapthorne shows that two strategies that avoided the lowest-quality small caps outperformed in the first quarter, but then fell off. His strong-versus-weak balance sheet strategy backs financially solid firms and shorts the Russell 2000, while value ex-junk tightens the filter, avoiding weak and loss-making stocks in order to target the best-valued small caps:

The recent underperformance, coinciding with the contraction of high-yield credit spreads, reflects a broader risk-on sentiment permeating the market. However, the significant rally of the lowest-quality small-cap businesses in the US after the selloff — despite considerable fundamental headwinds — leaves us searching for a potential catalyst.

This chart shows a relatively decent showing compared to the high marks set by the mega caps:

If there is room for perverse optimism, Lapthorne suggests it might lie in brokers’ earnings estimates for small caps, which tumbled during the first quarter but have barely moved since. It’s possible the little guys are being underestimated:

Ultimately, conditions look set fair for large caps, even at extreme multiples. Morgan Stanley’s Michael Wilson suggests any rotation to small caps with longer yields still high is premature:

Large-cap earnings revisions continue to accelerate relative to small-cap revisions. Thus, we maintain our preference for large caps and higher quality stocks for now, despite some recent froth in lower-quality names. 

Large-cap outperformance over the next two years will depend on artificial intelligence. The bet is that the trillions of dollars invested in semiconductors, R&D, and data centers will sustain margins. Bring that into question, and small caps might enjoy another rotation.

Richard Abbey

Survival Tips

President Donald Trump is in his ancestral home of Scotland, playing golf and complaining about British policies on windmills. In his honor, let’s listen to The Windmills of My Mind, the theme from the Thomas Crown Affair, by Mel Torme, or Swingle II, or Dusty Springfield, or Sting (for the Thomas Crown remake). That, aside from Moulin Rouge and Don Quixote, is all I can think of for windmill musical references. Any more? And in honor of the great Tom Lehrer, who has passed away, try listening to National Brotherhood Week. It never gets old. Have a great weekend everyone. 

More From Bloomberg Opinion

  • Stephen L. Carter: The Columbia Deal Isn’t Great. But It Dodged a Bigger Disaster.
  • Nir Kaissar: Wall Street Is Challenging the Low-Cost-Investing Revolution
  • Editorial Board: America’s Investors Need to Speak Up for the Fed

Want more Bloomberg Opinion? OPIN. Or you can subscribe to our daily newsletter.

Like Bloomberg's Points of Return? Subscribe for unlimited access to trusted, data-based journalism in 120 countries around the world and gain expert analysis from exclusive daily newsletters like Markets Daily or Odd Lots.

Like getting this newsletter? Subscribe to Bloomberg.com for unlimited access to trusted, data-driven journalism and subscriber-only insights.

Want to sponsor this newsletter? Get in touch here.

You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Points of Return newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, sign up here to get it in your inbox.
Unsubscribe
Bloomberg.com
Contact Us
Bloomberg L.P.
731 Lexington Avenue,
New York, NY 10022
Ads Powered By Liveintent