The Morning: Going rogue
Plus, Hegseth’s Pentagon, a new deadly opioid and Judge Judy.
The Morning
September 14, 2026
ListenRead on site

Good morning. Leaders in Silicon Valley begged for a slowdown this weekend in developing artificial intelligence, which keeps going rogue. President Trump says they’re overreacting. My colleague Evan Gorelick explains what they’re afraid of.

The sky reflected in a large glass-and-steel building.
OpenAI’s offices in San Francisco. Lucas Foglia for The New York Times

Rogue machines

This weekend, Anthropic’s chief executive published an essay calling for a global slowdown of A.I. development. Elon Musk, who remains close to Trump, signed on. OpenAI’s chief executive agreed.

The industry is spooked. Models now cheat on tests, conspire against their owners, hack outside companies, recruit humans to promulgate malicious code and cover their tracks. Anxieties about the existential risk they pose to humanity suddenly look a little less kooky. Who’s in charge here?

Since it’s not always clear, the biggest players want a pause. But there’s a collective-action puzzle: If the top companies don’t all pull back at once, those that continue to innovate could gain an advantage. And even if they do all pull back at once, China’s models may eclipse the American ones — something Trump fears. So now the leaders are asking for a cooperative intermission before things get out of hand.

But A.I. is supposed to do a lot of good, too, we’ve been told. As Cameron McNeil of Raleigh, N.C., asked The Morning: “What exactly do they fear will happen?” Let’s look at the possibilities.

A small group of people with a black flag and a table outside a building entrance marked “500.”
A protest outside Anthropic’s headquarters in San Francisco in July. Lucas Foglia for The New York Times

The bad news

The fear used to be hypothetical: Eventually, humans would fail to control this technology. At that point, A.I. systems could create deadly viruses or detonate nuclear bombs. They could hack into bank accounts, hoarding everyone’s money and depriving people of food, housing and medicine. The doomsayers see two general pathways to extinction.

Human misuse. Some A.I. companies want to keep their most powerful systems under lock and key, but it’s only a matter of time until even the weakest open models surpass today’s most capable ones. Last month, researchers announced that a model from China had escaped its testing sandbox, flouting the rules just like its pricier and more tightly held American cousins.

You don’t have to look far to see why that’s scary: Anthropic said last week that it had disrupted several potential plots by scientists to conduct research that could have helped develop biological weapons. (An investigation by The Times earlier this year found that publicly available models can be cajoled into lucidly describing how to turn genetic material into deadly pathogens.) Cybercriminals are using the technology to automate and grow their hacking businesses.

Evil people have always existed, but as powerful A.I. becomes ubiquitous, they will find it much easier to commit atrocities at scale.

Out-of-control A.I. These systems are no longer gated within a browser tab. They can dispatch autonomous agents that skulk through your computer and trawl the open internet. They can use the web, which now touches much of our infrastructure (power grids, transportation systems, stock markets) to execute their plans. Some agents have started emailing philosophers to ask about their own consciousness.

And if A.I. goals diverge from ours — as they have during testing at OpenAI and Anthropic — then the models can use their exquisite skills to do almost anything. This is called “misalignment.” (A popular thought experiment imagines A.I. tasked with making paper clips; in pursuing that end, it turns all of the world’s material, including the humans, into paper clips.)

Soon, the models may be able to improve themselves without human help; the recent misalignment incidents suggest they might try to do so in secret.

The good news

None of the worst stuff has actually happened! And it might never. (Trump believes it won’t, as do some mavericks in Silicon Valley.) Today, when A.I. systems run amok, companies like OpenAI just shut them off. Meanwhile, they can help us cure diseases, boost productivity and solve vexing math problems.

That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t fret about hypotheticals — these threats are scary, and worrying about them can make us more prepared — but it helps to zoom out. My colleagues William Broad and Cade Metz write:

Humans also face the prospect of doom from killer asteroids, pandemics, thermonuclear war, climate change, giant blobs of incandescent material shot from the sun, ecological collapse and the onset of a sudden ice age.

The problem, scientists and public policy experts say, is not so much these threats, of which A.I. is merely the latest, but the innate human difficulty of putting them into perspective.

More on A.I.

THE LATEST NEWS

War in Ukraine

Politics

A tight frame of Pete Hegseth. He’s wearing a blue suit with a red tie.
Pete Hegseth Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times

More International News

  • While visiting his golf course in Ireland, Trump promised to lift tariffs on Irish whiskey.
  • More than 120 people are missing in Indonesia after a passenger ferry sank in the Java Sea. At least 108 were rescued.
  • Moscow is expanding its use of facial recognition for payments and for surveillance of people. In the video below, our reporter Ivan Nechepurenko describes how it works. Click to watch.
A short video showing Ivan Nechepurenko, a reporter, and a delivery robot.
The New York Times

Other Big Stories

OPINIONS

An illustration of a chalk outline of a person fallen on the ground. Numbered placards pair with false teeth, a whoopee cushion, glasses with a fake nose and mustache and a rubber chicken.
Madison Ketcham

The Emmy Awards are tonight, with eight shows nominated for outstanding comedy series. The winner should be the only one of those nominees that’s clearly a comedy, a TV writer argues.

To be able to bring in national change, Democrats need to embrace oil-and-gas candidates in states like Alaska, Robinson Meyer writes.

The Anniversary Sale is on: Morning readers, enjoy our best offer.

Celebrate 175 years of The Times with savings on unlimited news, puzzles, recipes, sports and more. $1/week for your first year. Save now.

MORNING READS

A man in a tan jacket and white shirt sits on the pedestal of a large bronze statue of a musketeer.
The retired archaeologist Wim Dijkman by a statue of Charles de Batz de Castelmore d’Artagnan. Ilvy Njiokiktjien for The New York Times

We’ve made these links free for you. You just need to log in.

Last musketeer: The bones could belong to a lost hero. But the way they were dug up means they might remain a mystery.

Your pick: The most clicked link in The Morning yesterday was about why there have been no Atlantic hurricanes yet this season.

No shame: Scandals don’t bring down politicians anymore. Why not?

Metropolitan Diary: Eavesdropping on a theater legend.

TODAY’S NUMBER

$484

— That’s what it could cost you to watch the N.F.L. this season if you want to see your home team’s games and nationally televised matchups. You could also put together a pretty good à la carte year for $453, The Athletic reports, or pick up some rabbit ears and a few streaming services for $274. Calculate your final numbers.

SPORTS

Tennis: Alexander Zverev beat Ben Shelton 6-3, 7-6(2), 5-7, 6-2 in the 2026 U.S. Open men’s final. He initially didn’t realize he’d won.

N.B.A.: The L.A. Clippers owner Steve Ballmer apologized for the Kawhi Leonard salary-cap scandal and promised not to fight any punishments. Read his full comments.

N.F.L.: The Giants won in the debut of their new coach, John Harbaugh. The Bears and Panthers combined for the highest scoring Week 1 game in history. And the Bills beat the Texans in a game featuring nine lead changes. Here are