![]() AI’s Crisis of Trust. Plus. . . Erick Erickson and Tyler Cowen on why no one trusts AI—and what to do about it. Arthur Brooks on the tyranny of Facebook parents’ groups. Confessions of a former social justice warrior. And more.
What connects the backlash against data centers and Flock cameras? A lack of trust. (Andrew Elder for The Free Press)
It’s Tuesday, August 25. This is The Front Page, your daily window into the world of The Free Press—and our take on the world at large. Today: Arthur Brooks on the Facebook groups enabling a new, more extreme era of helicopter parenting. Why Trump would make a great mayor of D.C. Aaron MacLean on how the U.S. military can build the drones it needs—without China’s help. And much more. But first: Will America ever trust AI? So much of what we do at The Free Press is try to make sense of a world where trust is broken. What many see as a crisis of trust we think is, first and foremost, a crisis of trustworthiness. From government and the media to education and medicine, institutions that fought hard to earn the public’s trust have squandered it. That change is the story of our time, and once you understand it, you recognize it everywhere—including in two of the most contentious debates out there right now: over data centers and Flock surveillance cameras. We’ve covered both of these fights, and at root, they point toward a question even more existential than how we view AI, crime, and privacy. Once that trust is lost, can it ever be earned back? Today, Erick Erickson traces the collapse in trust back to March of 2020 and the months that followed. His essay is unsparing in its assessment of who, on both sides of the aisle, is responsible for the crisis, and clear-eyed about what it will take to win the public back. Who should we trust to write the rules for a technology transforming our world at such a rapid pace that the government can’t keep up? That’s the question Tyler Cowen tackles in his column today. He sketches a proposal that he says strikes a balance between overregulation and an AI Wild West: a private, not-for-profit regulatory body for AI companies. “The concrete truth,” Tyler argues, “is that there is far more expertise within the companies for judging AI safety than we can expect to find in the federal government anytime soon.” Read his column on how this regulatory body would work, and why we need it. —The Editors
|