TL;DR: Meta may stop funding the Oversight Board—its independent content moderation body—Platformer reported yesterday. The news caps a year in which Meta has been systematically dismantling much of its moderation infrastructure and increasingly handing trust and safety to AI and the community itself. What happened: Meta told members of the board that it may stop funding it after 2028, following significant budget cuts this year and more expected in the next few years, according to Platformer. The two sides are reportedly negotiating a compromise, including a possible full split in which the board would serve other platforms (and have to find its own funding). Platformer says that “eliminating all funding” isn’t Meta’s “preferred option,” but its sources say it’s “unclear what changes the board would have to make to secure additional funding.” What is the Oversight Board?: The board launched in 2020 as a kind of supreme court for content moderation: an independent body empowered to make binding decisions about content on Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, and advise Meta on policy. Mark Zuckerberg pitched the idea amid intense criticism over the company's handling of hate speech and misinformation. The board was seeded with $130 million, and Meta added another $150 million in 2022. Since 2020, the board has reviewed more than 200 cases spanning hate speech enforcement, political expression in conflict zones, religious and cultural speech disputes, and more. More speech, less oversight: The board’s potential defunding comes as Meta makes a broader retreat on dedicated moderation, including shifting more of it onto AI. In January 2025, Meta also scrapped its third-party fact-checking program in favor of crowdsourced Community Notes—which produced just 900 published notes in its first six months in the US, compared to roughly 35 million posts professional fact-checkers labeled in the EU during the same period. The board warned last month that Community Notes "are not a proper substitute" for fact-checking and could "pose significant human rights risks" if expanded globally. Meanwhile, Zuckerberg has apparently been taking a more hands-on approach to content decisions—per texts released last week as part of the Elon Musk vs. OpenAI lawsuit, he texted Musk offering to take down content "doxxing or threatening" DOGE employees. Bottom line: The Oversight Board was built to limit any one person's power over what billions of people can say online. If it loses its funding, Meta will have shed its fact-checkers, its hate speech safeguards, and its only independent oversight body in roughly a year. —WK |