We asked our reporters, who play so well with others, to choose a favorite story from 2025 by a Retail Brew colleague. As evidenced by my favorite Andrew Adam Newman story last year, Andy loves to get his boots on the ground. And earlier this year, he marched them to New Jersey’s American Dream Mall, where he accompanied Kara Richardson Whitely, CEO of The Gorgeous Agency, which helps retail brands address the plus-sized market, on a shopping trip to find an outfit for an upcoming conference. As a plus-sized woman—encompassing size 14 and up, a market worth $40 billion, she estimated—Richardson Whitely hates in-person shopping. Visiting several stores that had previously touted in-store availability of extended sizes, Whitely showed Andy one reason for her dread, encapsulated in this exchange with a Lululemon associate: “Excuse me,” she said. “What size leggings do you carry in the store?” “What size are you looking for?” “Twenty.” “Twenty we don’t carry unfortunately. The highest we carry is a 14.” “A size 14. Thanks, do you carry anything else in a 20?” “No. Actually, we used to, I don’t know why we don’t anymore.” Then another employee who’d said that she thought there might be a couple items on the sale rack, the result of the company encouraging online returns to stores, checked and apologized that it was just one pair of leggings, and it was a size 18—way too small. “When you’re making a promise to a customer that you’re going to have plus sizes, you have to carry through,” Richardson Whitely told me as we were leaving the store. “That was a rejection. I want to spend money there, right? And I can’t.” Andy’s chronicle of Richardson Whitely’s fruitless shopping trip presented an unfortunate reality for plus-sized shoppers—and a call to action for retailers. Read the original story: I went to a mall with a plus-sized retail consultant. Now I know why she dreads shopping.—EC |