What we know about the peace plan on the table ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

The Trump administration has attempted to force Ukraine back to the negotiating table with a 28-point peace plan that stunned many observers.

As Matthew Sussex writes, the plan looked – and sounded – as if it had been written by Russia. It would have had as much credibility if it was written in crayon, Sussex writes.

With the proposal, the United States has again backed Ukraine into a corner, demanding massive concessions and a swift response, while expecting very little from the Russian side.

So, where to from here? Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky said overnight Ukraine was ready to move ahead with the deal, but wants to discuss changes with US President Donald Trump. 

As Sussex notes, the stakes are high. The plan, as originally written, could be disastrous for the country.

 

Justin Bergman

International Affairs Editor

 

How the Trump administration tried to sell Ukraine a diplomatic debacle

Matthew Sussex, Australian National University

Once again, Trump has proven he is more interested in long-term deals with autocrats than achieving just and lasting resolutions to security crises.

View from The Hill: it’s been a carefully orchestrated political courtship, but the marriage could be rocky

Michelle Grattan, University of Canberra

No union is always smooth sailing, but the probable Barnaby Joyce and Pauline Hanson partnership may be testier than most.

AI slop is Macquarie’s 2025 Word of the Year. I applaud the choice – but was bored by the shortlist

Roslyn Petelin, The University of Queensland

AI slop was the clear winner of Macquarie’s Word of the Year – it also won the People’s Choice Award. Honourable mentions included another AI-related word: clanker.

‘The main thing you’ve got is TikTok’: how the social media ban could harm African diaspora youth

Melanie Baak, University of South Australia; Claire Moran, University of South Australia; Monash University

In new research, young African Australians speak about how they get vital information about their culture and identity on social media.

New data reveals how Australia’s threatened reptiles and frogs are disappearing – and what we have to do

Geoffrey Heard, The University of Queensland; Australian National University; Sarah McGrath, The University of Queensland; Tayla Lawrie, The University of Queensland

Australia is home to many endangered reptiles and frogs. This national snapshot shows their numbers have dropped sharply. But it’s possible to reverse this trend.

Should we ‘get over’ print books in the digital age – or are they more precious than ever?

Beth Driscoll, The University of Melbourne

Print books embody culture. We see it in social media trends for annotating books, community publishing and wartime destruction of books spanning the Nazis to Gaza.

A backlash against AI imagery in ads may have begun as brands promote ‘human-made’

Paul Harrison, Deakin University

What does creativity mean when machines can generate entire advertising campaigns?

Politics + Society

Health + Medicine

Business + Economy

Education

  • NZ’s draft science curriculum favours rote learning over critical thinking

    Sara Tolbert, Monash University; Ben Kennedy, University of Canterbury; Sibel Erduran, University of Oxford; Troy D Sadler, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Critical thinking is an essential skill students should be encouraged to develop as part of their science learning. NZ’s draft science curriculum fails the test.

Environment + Energy

Science + Technology

Arts + Culture

I read it on AI
"Mindless propagation and following of conspiracy theories without any definitive proof is clearly dangerous on a number of levels. Too often, people swallow these theories whole, based on hypotheses that ‘make sense’, or ‘ring bells’. Unfortunately there appears to be a phenomenon where many people, having accepted one theory, go on to accept all others. Who, then, is the arbiter of truth in the design and implementation of AI and its ‘guardrails’? What is the cost to humanity if we get this wrong?"
Ingrid Palmer

Protect our libraries
"As a librarian, I was heartened to read that Australia's public libraries are thriving – particularly when viewed against the trends in the USA and UK. It’s disappointing to read our libraries are employing fewer trained librarians, even though I understand the reasons. Librarians still have a few skills not covered by Google or AI. However, it’s the decrease in funding which I find most alarming. Libraries are not an optional extra – they are essential to the life and wellbeing of our country."
Josephine Hennock

Thanks for your support Lyn!
“I have been getting the daily issue of The Conversation since the beginning really, and have on occasion given feedback on my appreciation of the diversity and veracity of the articles. I really value news I can trust. Every now and then, one issue will cover a range of issues that are important, informative and for me, riveting. Yesterday was one of those days. I’m happy to continue my support for The Conversation.”
Lyn Pearson

We'd love to hear from you. You can email us with your thoughts on our stories and each day we'll publish an edited selection.

 

Featured jobs

View all
List your job
 
 
 
 
 

Featured Events, Courses & Podcasts

View all