A new weekly newsletter from the Guardian
͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌     

My week: A new newsletter, a badly timed outfit, and the joy of small stadiums | The Guardian

Support the Guardian

Fund independent journalism

Matters of Opinion - The Guardian
Zack Polanski reacts to news of his leadership win as he stands with the Green party’s MPs, Carla Denya (L), Ellie Chowns, and Adrian Ramsay, on 2 September 2025.
06/09/2025

My week: A new newsletter, a badly timed outfit, and the joy of small stadiums

Hugh Muir Hugh Muir
 

Welcome to Matters of Opinion, the first of our new weekly newsletters from the Guardian’s Opinion desk. Newspaper Opinion sections have a long history of notebooks and diaries – places where writers can talk about things that have caught their eye and give a sense of how their minds work, and the conversations they have to reach their conclusions.

Part of the joy of working with the Guardian’s brilliant slate of writers is speaking to them every week and hearing how their views develop, and how they reach their conclusions – and we wanted to give you a chance to experience that too. Each week, you’ll hear from one of our columnists, writers or editors about their week: what they’ve been thinking about, debating, watching, reading and more. Our inaugural edition is from me, Hugh Muir, the executive editor of Opinion.

Welcome to your first Matters of Opinion newsletter, featuring Guardian voices in conversation about a key debate of the week.

You are receiving this newsletter as you are a subscriber to our Guardian Opinion UK newsletter. We now offer this new weekly newsletter from our columnists and writers, and wanted to share it with you. You can update your email and newsletter preferences at any time by logging in to your Guardian account or registering here. Thank you for reading.

Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties

What I’ve been thinking about

Angela Rayner arrives in Downing Street on 2 September 2025.
camera Angela Rayner arriving at Downing Street on 2 September, the day before she admitted not paying enough stamp duty on her Hove flat. Photograph: Wiktor Szymanowicz/Future Publishing/Getty Images

Among the questions I found myself asking this week was how much does it matter if a top politician looks too much like a film star? After all, any number of male politicians have been photographed in slick, sharp suits. Tony Blair survived the row over the garish, grossly expensive designer swimming trunks he once wore holidaying on a yacht in Sicily.

But the world isn’t fair, the playing field isn’t level; and when I first looked at that picture of Angela Rayner, emerging from the back of a plush car on her way to a cabinet meeting in a cream-coloured jacket, with bright green trousers, eyes hidden behind chunky, angular, mint-and-tortoiseshell sunglasses, I thought: “Uh-oh! This won’t end well.” As we know, it really hasn’t.

Even in the light of recent tumultuous events, it is worth interrogating these initial thoughts. There is no law that says that politicians must be nondescript, or wear outfits made from hessian sacks. Similarly, there is no law that says Labour politicos or anyone else of progressive ambition and/or outlook must be drab and sombre. The Daily Mail loves to deride “champagne socialists”, to which you fire back the adage of the radical American union leader of yore, Big Bill Haywood: “nothing is too good”, he said, for the working class. In addition, society too often unfairly critiques women for their appearance – not least the Daily Mail, for whom the picture was Labour-bashing catnip.

But still, “uh-oh”: not because of the look itself, but the context of any political leader – subject, as they all are these days, to accusations of elitism – appearing in oversized sunglasses, as if swishing from a limo at Cannes.

That “uh-oh” was initially a sense of vague uneasiness, with no knowledge of what was to come. But once Rayner hit big trouble over the underpayment of stamp duty on her £800k seaside flat – a deficiency hovering around the £40,000 mark – that picture became a thousand words, none of them helpful to Rayner’s chances of survival.

The row alone was perilous, but together with that image, it became a perfect storm from which her public image could not recover. That’s politics. Be glad the likes of you and I can step out in whatever snazzy sunglasses we like.

Did Keir Starmer and Kemi Badenoch look up at the TV on Tuesday and say “Uh-oh”, on seeing Zack Polanski had won the Green leadership by a country mile? Part of me hopes they did. I think they should have. He looks ready for a scrap.

It’s difficult to know how much store to set by a Green leadership campaign, but this feels like a moment. Starmer is tanking, Badenoch is bad, and come the next election, with a few more Green MPs and a hung parliament, the Greens could have some leverage. Polanski came in swinging, dubbing Farage a charlatan. As for Starmer, he said: “I cannot imagine any scenario in which I would want to work with Keir Starmer” – and by this point, many a Labour MP has probably said the same. But note the language: “I cannot imagine any scenario” is what I like to call a catflap: the door appears closed, but there is a way out. Michael Heseltine, in the mists that were the 1990s, denied Tory leadership ambitions with the line: “I can forsee no circumstances under which a challenge would take place.” He challenged for it later that year. These are the tricks, Zack. These are the big leagues.

I was pleased last week to run a piece by Rowan Williams, the former archbishop of Canterbury, who – as befits a man of the cloth – assailed the view that fun is to be had terrorising asylum seekers in hotels and suggesting they be burnt down. This opposing view may not seem radical from a theologian, but it was worth saying.

Would that there was an actual archbishop of Canterbury to say it, but since November last year, when Justin Welby fell to earth, the position has been vacant. Normally nobody would worry about an archbishopatorial hiatus, but at a time in our politics when, for some, turning the other cheek means insouciance about deporting women and children to countries where they may face death, one is entitled to expect some kind of lofty moral intervention. To be honest, The Vicar of Dibley would do for me at this stage.

What I’ve been up to

Charles Martin and Charlotte Rampling in DNA, series 2.
camera Charles Martin and Charlotte Rampling in DNA, series 2. Photograph: Klara Cvrckova/BBC/Zentropa

What I’ve been watching | I’m ploughing through DNA, a Danish detective series, available on BBC iPlayer, which flips between Denmark, France, Poland and Romania, all the while basking in its European-ness. It benefits from Charlotte Rampling as a sort of jolly hockey sticks but French Miss Marple, sifting clues in a haughty, finger-wagging fashion. Crimes are solved, shirts tucked in.

What I’ve been listening to | I was directed towards Shadow World: The Grave Robbers, an amazing BBC podcast investigation about gangsters who forged documents to steal the homes of people who died without leaving a valid will. From a slow start, multi-award-winning investigator Sue Mitchell finds victims and villains, and closes the loophole that made the crimes possible. That’s why we have a BBC.

Where I’ve been | After mega-stadium experiences watching West Ham at the London Stadium – the one that hosted the 2012 Olympics, where the players and the crowd exist in different postcodes – I went back to basics to the homely cauldron that is Leyton Orient’s ground to see them lose 0-1 to Northampton Town. I marvelled at the engagement and passion – and then realised that was because the crowd could actually see what was happening on the pitch. Makes a difference apparently.

 
The Guardian Feast app

My Feast collections

Available now on the Feast app

With My Feast collections, you can now organise all your saved recipes into customisable folders, ready for you to cook when the time suits you.

Start your culinary journey today with a free 14-day trial.

 

From the rest of the team

Illustration: Olga Khaletskaya/The Guardian
camera A ‘deep dive on YouTube video essays’. Illustration: Olga Khaletskaya/The Guardian

I really enjoyed this history of the New Yorker’s fact-checking department. Their process is notoriously in-depth, and it’s always nice to read about how other publications work. Kirsty Major, deputy Opinion editor

Ella Baron’s cartoons always startle me; they are beautifully drawn, but violence and vulnerability is never far away. Her offering on Tuesday – about how the far right is exploiting violence against women – was an exemplar. Warren Howard, deputy production editor, Opinion

This deep-dive on YouTube video essays by my Opinion colleague Kirsty Major is the piece to read to understand this phenomenon: essays in video form that rack up millions of views, drawing the envy of the likes of Adam Curtis. Barbara Speed, deputy head of Opinion

I really enjoyed Remona Aly reminiscing about her favourite childhood outfit: trying to look cool on a family Eurotrip, she unknowingly donned a bootleg T-shirt advertising ecstasy pills. Stephen Buranyi, assistant editor, Opinion

Comedian Stewart Lee’s podcast series What Happened to Counter-Culture, the last part of which was on Radio 4 this week, tracks anti-establishment movements from 1950s beats through punk to the tech-communists who’ve become the new conservative establishment: a case of counter-culture eating itself … Sarah Bolesworth, assistant production editor, Opinion