Oncology has long been pharma’s biggest bucket for R&D, with investment historically leading to some of pharma’s most impactful breakthroughs. Learn more in
this Trendline.
Bipartisan congressional efforts have become a rarity. But during a push and pull over biomedical R&D funding, House Republicans recently strayed from the party line to try and keep the money flowing. In a fiscal 2026 spending bill released this week, GOP lawmakers held NIH funding steady at $48 billion instead of the Trump administration’s proposed 40% cuts. While the bill isn’t likely to get far in the legislative process, the move sends a signal that the House is at least willing to put politics aside to maintain federal research investments, which used to be considered a bipartisan goal.
For researchers, the financial winds are already shifting away from the U.S., and governments elsewhere are happy to reel them in. Today, we’re exploring how Europe and the U.K. have become appealing to U.S. researchers as destinations for work — and the incentives they’re providing to inspire scientists to make the leap.
Thanks for reading.
Michael Gibney Senior Editor & Writer, PharmaVoice Email
This handbook will help you accelerate your research by helping plan your imaging experiments. The guide covers main procedural steps to achieve your best results. Download your guide to best results now.
The rundown from yesterrday
Yesterday, we looked at the ways drugmakers could reorganize their businesses to become more adaptable in the age of tariffs and shifting drug pricing policies.
PharmaVoice readers who said that more drugs should be approved using the accelerated approval process, evenly split with those who said there should not be more.
Budget cuts are forcing pharma teams to rethink medical communications strategies for maximum impact. See how industry leaders are doing more with less in this infographic.